top of page
  • Writer's pictureCostello Safety

Navigating the New Terrain: Understanding the Recent Shifts in Worker Classification Laws


What is a 100 employee?

In the ever-evolving landscape of labor laws, a pivotal change has occurred that reshapes the way we classify workers in the United States. The U.S. Department of Labor has introduced modifications to the regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), focusing on the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors which will begin on March 11, 2024. This change is more than a mere administrative update; it is a significant shift that aligns closely with judicial precedent and the Act's original intent.


At the heart of these changes is the adoption of a multifactor economic reality test. This test is designed to assess a worker's employment status by considering multiple factors, each holding equal importance. This approach replaces the previous "core factors" methodology, which placed undue emphasis on certain aspects while overlooking others. The new rule emphasizes a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis, which means that no single factor can solely determine a worker's classification.


Examples of the Multifactor Economic Reality Test:


  1. Opportunity for Profit or Loss: This factor examines whether the worker can earn more by exercising personal initiative, managerial skills, or business acumen. For instance, a freelance graphic designer who actively markets their services and negotiates contracts has a higher opportunity for profit or loss compared to a worker assigned tasks with no say in the business operations.

  2. Degree of Control Over Work: This looks at the extent of the employer's influence on the work process. For example, an IT consultant who sets their own schedule and chooses their methodology demonstrates a lower degree of control by the employer, indicating independent contractor status.

  3. Investment in Facilities and Equipment: Consideration is given to the investment in tools, equipment, or facilities needed to perform the work. A carpenter who owns their tools and workshop is more likely to be an independent contractor, unlike a worker who uses the employer's tools and facilities.

  4. Permanence of the Relationship: This factor assesses whether the work relationship is temporary or indefinite. A marketing specialist hired for a specific short-term project may be seen as an independent contractor, unlike a long-term, ongoing administrative assistant.

  5. Integration into the Business: This involves evaluating how integral the worker's services are to the business's core operations. A baker in a bakery is more integral and likely an employee, whereas a plumber fixing a leak in the bakery is less integral and more likely an independent contractor.

  6. Level of Skill and Initiative Required: This factor looks at the level of skill and the extent of the initiative the worker uses to market their services, manage time, and decide on the order and sequence of the work. A software developer creating a product independently and selling it to various clients demonstrates a high level of skill and initiative, leaning towards independent contractor status.


This shift in regulation is a response to the need for more clarity and consistency in worker classification. It addresses the complexities of modern employment relationships, which have evolved significantly since the original enactment of the FLSA. By focusing on economic reality rather than rigid criteria, the Department of Labor aims to provide clearer guidance to employers and workers alike.


For professionals in the field of safety and health, these changes underscore the importance of staying informed and adaptable. It is crucial to understand how these regulatory modifications impact the classification of workers, as it affects compliance with various labor laws, including minimum wage and overtime provisions, recordkeeping, and workers' compensation insurance.


Employers should review their current worker classifications in light of these new guidelines. It's essential to assess whether workers currently classified as independent contractors meet the criteria under the economic reality test. Misclassification can lead to significant legal and financial consequences, making it imperative for businesses to ensure compliance with the updated regulations.


In summary, the new rule fosters a more nuanced and realistic approach to worker classification. It reflects a deeper understanding of the diverse and dynamic nature of the modern workforce. As safety professionals, we must embrace these changes, ensuring that our practices align with the law and protect the rights and well-being of all workers.


This new regulatory landscape offers an opportunity for businesses to reassess their workforce structures, ensuring that they not only comply with the law but also reflect the economic realities of their operations. By doing so, they can avoid potential legal pitfalls and foster a fair, equitable, and productive working environment.


You can download a copy of the updated Federal Ruling by clicking the button below.




49 views0 comments
bottom of page